Im a bit annoyed
ive read reciently and heard people say wfp isnt very good ( or not as good as trad )
even on this forum.
yes you can have some problem windows i admit but they normaly rectify in time.
i once was a wfp Hater (and slater) but now i dissagree
wfp can be every bit as good as trad if done propperly
better than trad on new pvc windows.
what you all think?
i totaly agree the thing that annoys me the most is that these comments come from people who have never used or seen wfp in action
there is a new window cleaner around our way that ive spoken to a few times, he told me the other day he'd been on local radio to promote traditional
window cleaning apparently the waterfed guy did'nt turn up to give his veiw so wfp got a slating
ive been window cleaning 20 years and wfp about 1 year there is no way i would use anything that would jeopardize my business. all my customers are more than happy with the results. all the sceptical customers ive had have all turned round and said "yes it really deos work i never expected it to".
my mate has been window cleaning as long as me but he is still trad and untill reacently ive had all the comments from him about wfp telling
me what it can and cant do and it bugs the hell out of me because hes never even seen it work. as it turned out we ended up doing a big job together
where i wfp the tops and he trad bottoms but guess what we now use all my gear and wfp the lot and hes eaten his words
my opinion is if wfp used correctly it is fantastic and more often gets better results than trad
i am 99% wfp but still use trad for that 1% i think both ways are still very effective its like evrything else, you need the right tools for the job in hand.
